 |
|
BMW X3
|
|
|
Acura RDX
|
|
|
Mazda CX-7
|
|
|
Toyota FJ Cruiser
|
|
|
Jeep Wrangler Photos by Tracey Kroll
|
Automakers now offer more performance-oriented versions of nearly all types of vehicles, from small cars to SUVs. Small SUVs,
which historically have been functional, versatile, and affordable, are the latest group of vehicles to gain these sporty
and sophisticated variants.
The BMW X3 was the first small SUV to emphasize sporty on-road characteristics and more amenities than vehicles such as the
Toyota RAV4 and Honda CR-V. For 2007 the Acura RDX and the Mazda CX-7 join the X3, and other automakers have plans to enter
this segment in the near future.
At the other extreme are small SUVs that stand out for their off-road performance. Long before the term SUV was coined, the
ancestor of the Jeep Wrangler stood essentially alone in this class. It wasn’t the most comfortable or practical vehicle,
but its off-road prowess was well established. For 2007 the redesigned Wrangler faces competition from the new retro-styled
Toyota FJ Cruiser.
We’ve split the tested small SUVs into two groups. The first group includes the $43,120
BMW X3, $37,165
Acura RDX, and $32,915
Mazda CX-7. The other contains the rugged $30,621
Toyota FJ Cruiser and $30,735
Jeep Wrangler (available to
subscribers).
The freshened X3 now has a more powerful engine, a six-speed automatic transmission, and some interior improvements. It is
still based on the old 3 Series wagon and is agile and fun to drive. But while BMW has improved the ride, it still feels nervous
and choppy. Interior quality has been improved with softer plastics and leather replacing cheaper materials. With typical
options such as leather seats, power lumbar support, Bluetooth, and a cold-weather package, the price ballooned to over $43,000.
The RDX competes directly with the X3, but it’s considerably cheaper. It shares a platform with the redesigned Honda CR-V
but comes with a turbocharged four-cylinder engine. It delivers plenty of power but lacks the refinement of a six-cylinder
and doesn’t deliver any fuel economy advantage. The RDX is agile, but the ride is stiff and road noise is pronounced. The
cabin is well appointed and comfortable, but the audio controls are difficult to use. We added the navigation system and rear-view
camera option package.
The CX-7 shares components with the Mazda6 sedan and the small Mazda5 minivan. The turbocharged four-cylinder engine delivers
good midrange power, but the CX-7 is plagued by a significant hesitation at low revs/engine speeds. Fuel economy is also unimpressive.
The Mazda is agile and secure when cornering, but the ride is stiff and the cabin is noisy. Our Grand Touring AWD model was
equipped with a navigation system, rear camera, sunroof, and smart key.
The Toyota FJ Cruiser is based on the 4Runner SUV and is styled similarly to early Toyota Land Cruisers. The engine is strong
and the FJ is extremely capable off-road. However, it’s poorly suited for daily use. Visibility is quite poor and the rear-hinged
doors are awkward. Routine and emergency handling is clumsy; the ride is compliant but unsettled. We fitted our FJ with comfort
options such as cruise control, keyless entry, and an audio system upgrade, in addition to a locking rear differential for
off-road. A part-time four-wheel-drive system comes with the automatic transmission, but a full-time system comes with the
6-speed manual transmission.
The Jeep Wrangler is a big improvement over the previous generation. It is more civilized, with better on-road ride and handling,
more interior space and creature comforts, improved safety equipment, and available four doors.
Jeep fans will be happy with its off-road capability and traditional styling. But the vague steering, stiff ride, low handling
limits, and noisy interior limit its appeal. Options include the new removable hard top, side air bags, limited slip rear
differential, and an audio upgrade. The Wrangler’s four-wheel drive system is part time.
|
WHY WE CAN’T RECOMMEND THE BMW X3 OR TOYOTA FJ
The BMW X3 and Toyota FJ Cruiser have their strengths. The X3 is agile and fun to drive and we predict excellent reliability
for the FJ. Yet we can’t recommend either.
CR only recommends vehicles that have an average or better predicted reliability Rating, have performed well in our testing,
and have done well in independent crash and rollover tests.
While the X3 performed well in our testing, its predicted reliability Rating had dropped to worse than average. On the other
hand, the FJ Cruiser has a predicted reliability Rating of much better than average, but it didn’t perform well in our road
tests.
Our annual survey of subscribers gives us real-world reliability data on problems they’ve had with their vehicles. In the
2006 survey we received responses on 1.3 million vehicles. And our test program has more than 50 individual tests and evaluations,
from which we generate the overall road-test score.
Full reliability results from our 2006 Annual Survey will be published in our Annual Autos Issue in April and on ConsumerReports.org.
|