| About - DieHard Gold 50665 (North) |
|---|
|
The DieHard Gold 50665 (North) is part of the car battery test program at Consumer Reports. In our lab tests, car battery models like the Gold 50665 (North) are rated on multiple criteria, such as those listed below.
|
| About This Brand |
|---|
Available at Sears and Kmart automotive centers. |
| Features & Specs - DieHard Gold 50665 (North) | |
|---|---|
| |
Yes |
| |
No |
| |
880 |
| More features and specs | |
Consumer Reports User Reviews
Already own it? Write a review
By from
(1 of 2 customers found this review helpful)
Battery fine- [@] install charges high
4/6/2012
Pros
Car is parked outside
Have had good history
High power rating
Sealed battery
Cons
Questionable warranty
Unadvertised increase
Best Uses
Comment:
This is just the battery I was looking for since my car is always parked outside in a central New England area.As the battery is in the engine compartment when it can get hot (rather than the rear seat, I wanted a sealed battery. It has a high initial rating.My biggest issue is that it is sold by [@] as they charged $20 just to undo two cables, check the new battery and put the cables on it. Although they advertised a $12 charge, the actual fee was $20. I should have tried to do it myself.
How long have you owned it:
Three-to-six months
Bottom Line
Yes, I would recommend this to a friend.
By from
(5 of 6 customers found this review helpful)
Battery stinks!
2/20/2012
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comment:
Bought battery and after a month it burned out my alternator....took it back to Sears and they tested battery. Battery was producing way to many amps, so it burned out my alternator on my F-150. Cost me $150.00 to replace. They gave me a new battery. After a year I have had to have the truck jumped on 3 occasions. Went to Sears and they said they would have to test battery, but that would cost me $20.00. Had enough....time to go with Interstate!
How long have you owned it:
More than six months
Bottom Line
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
By from
(5 of 5 customers found this review helpful)
Not so great
12/30/2011
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comment:
Purchased in 2008. After a year, had to replace due to a bad cell. Was replaced free under warranty. Replacement went bad. Went to [@] for a replacement and they said the warranty goes back to the original purchase, so I would have to pay 50% for a new battery. For [$], I wish the batteries would last to their promised life span.
How long have you owned it:
More than six months
Bottom Line
Other User Reviews
There are 0 reviews from the web










