Indicates subscriber only content

Tires

Yokohama Geolandar H/T-S G051
Yokohama-Geolandar H/T-S G051Tire-image
Approximate retail price:
$133.30
Price it button
Summary: An all season tire designed for light duty pickups and SUVs. It has a 60,000 mile treadwear warranty.
Dividing line
Community icon23 people have reviewed this model.
About - Yokohama Geolandar H/T-S G051

The Yokohama Geolandar H/T-S G051 is part of the tire test program at Consumer Reports. In our lab tests, all season truck tire models like the Geolandar H/T-S G051 are rated on multiple criteria, such as those listed below.


Dry braking:
Dry braking is from 60 to 0 mph.

Wet braking:
Wet braking is from 60 to 0 mph.

Handling:
Handling includes how well the tires gripped in an avoidance maneuver involving a swerve into the left lane and back into the right lane; wet and dry cornering grip on our skid pad; and subjective steering feel.
About This Brand

Yokohama is a Japanese company with a global presence. Its North America headquarters are in southern California. Targeting performance enthusiasts, Yokohama tires place emphasis on handling and dry and wet grip. Its tires reflect this focus, our testing shows. Generally, we find that Yokohama tires are a good choice for consumers who live where winter driving is not a factor.

Features & Specs - Yokohama Geolandar H/T-S G051
info Size tested P265/70R17
info Speed rating S
info Treadwear warranty 60000
info UTQG treadwear 500
info UTQG traction A
info UTQG temperature B
More features and specs
User Reviews - Yokohama Geolandar H/T-S G051
Consumer Reports User Reviews
Already own it? Write a review
By from
 
2.0
These last 50K miles, at least for me
1/12/2013
Pros
Cons
Tread life
Best Uses
Comment:
I gave 2 stars, would give 2.5 stars. They just don't last the full 60,000 miles. The traction was not good on ice and snow, but granted this is when the tires were worn out. Overall these were just ok. Not happy with the life of these tires. I see here on consumer reports, second lowest rated? wow! I may not know what a good tire looks like. Been riding on these for a while, actually I probably have bought 6 to 8 of these, not anymore after reading consumer reports.
How long have you owned it:
More than six months
Bottom Line
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
By from
 
2.0
Tires need to be replaced at 38K
11/3/2012
Pros
Dry grip
Handling
Ride comfort
Wet grip
Cons
Noise
Tread life
Best Uses
Comment:
The tires have done a decent job but at 38K they are toast (they are supposed to go 60K). And I drove them no differently then the Michelins the SUV came with, and they went 64K. <br />I have to get them replaced since they are down to 2/32. Not pleased.
How long have you owned it:
More than six months
Bottom Line
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
By from
 
2.0
Agree with Rolling Resistance rating
7/2/2012
Pros
Dry grip
Wet grip
Cons
Handling
Noise
Rolling resistance
Best Uses
Comment:
The tire is OK all round but I won't be buying another set. I dropped about 1 mpg in my Element when these were put on. Handling is predictable but could use more traction. Straight line brake performance is good.
How long have you owned it:
More than six months
Bottom Line
No, I would not recommend this to a friend.
Other User Reviews
There are 0 reviews from the web
See all Models
Nobody Tests Like
We Do
Our testers put 100s of products through their paces at our National Testing and Research Center. Learn more about how we test for:
Performance
Safety
Reliability
Learn more