February 2006
send to a friend printable version

Retirement plans: What we got

$500 TO $650

T. Rowe Price
Retirement Income Manager
www.troweprice.com


Price:
$500 for the plan. Free if you invest $1 million or more.

Service included:
Recommended retirement portfolio plus two alternatives. Free annual review for T. Rowe Price investors.

The experience:
Planner was assigned. Two half-hour calls, with longer follow-up.

Pros:
Good alternative investment options.

Cons:
Initial recommended mix (47% stocks, 37% bonds, 16% percent short-term securities) is very conservative for retirees. Projected inflation (3%) and wife’s age of death (85) too low. Plan didn’t analyze alternative actions (e.g., work longer, downsize home). No specific funds were recommended.

Best if:
You’re a T. Rowe Price client.



Alliance of Cambridge Advisors

www.cambridgeadvisors.com

Price:
$500 for “starter package.”

Service included:
6 “action points,” including creating 3- to 6-month emergency fund, opening home-equity line of credit, changing 401(k) asset mix, saving 10% of salary.

Experience:
Client chose planner through Cambridge search engine. Worked with planner in three sessions over the phone.

Pros:
Good conclusions. Fine 401(k) mix for young investors: 40% large-cap, 20% small-cap, 20% international, 20% balanced fund (invests in stocks and bonds).

Cons:
No rationale for recommendations.

Best if:
You can meet the planner in person.



Garrett Planning Network

www.garrettplanningnetwork.com


Price:
$650

Service included:
One-time plan.

Experience:
Client chose planner through Garrett’s search engine. Planner listened to client’s needs, then proposed price range. Two meetings of at least one hour, plus several phone calls.

Pros:
Easy-to-follow plan, more comprehensive than most. Focused on current needs. Good projection of insurance needs, list of suggested insurers. Good advice to update beneficiaries, use budgeting tool.

Cons:
No investment recommendations in the initial plan.

Best if: You can meet the planner in person.


$100 TO $250

Myfinancialadvice
www.myfinancialadvice.com

Price:
$250 for the plan.

Service included:
Recommended funds. Advice on when to take Social Security.

The experience:
Chose planner through Web site’s search engine. Planner listened to clients’ needs, then proposed price. Responses were generally prompt. Three 15- to 30-minute calls, a few e-mails.

Pros:
Reasonable and specific no-load mix for retirement: 60% stocks, 40% bonds.

Cons:
No implementation plan. Inconsistent advice: Have relatively conservative fund mix, but keep risky sector funds. Initial contact and payment had to be made through the Web site, an annoyance. Very aggressive assumptions.

Best if:
You’re a do-it-yourselfer who wants a quick validation of a current plan.



T. Rowe Price
Investment Checkup
www.troweprice.com


Price:
$250.

Service included:
One-time portfolio analysis and recommendations.

Experience:
Adviser was assigned. Two hour-long phone calls.

Pros:
Clear, detailed, accurate plan. Good, specific fund mix for young investors: 80% stocks, 20% bonds. Good advice on adjusting the mix. Discussion of tax issues.

Cons:
Uses only proprietary funds.

Best if: You’re a T. Rowe Price client.



Financial engines
www.financialengines.com

Price:
$39.95 per quarter, $149.95 per year for basic service, $300 per year for deluxe. Free, or at a discount, through some companies’ retirement plans.

Service included:
Interactive online software forecasts if you can meet specific goals. Recommends asset-mix changes.

Pros:
Good allocation advice: 70% stocks, 28% bonds, 2% cash for midlife investor. Will include investments from any source you choose. Robust action kit tells what to transfer where. Responsive phone help.

Cons:
Doesn’t show how investments will fluctuate each year in retirement. For a computer program, relatively little flexibility in changing “what if” scenarios.

Best if:
You’re a sophisticated investor and get the service via your retirement plan.

 

FREE

Charles Schwab
Goal Planner
www.schwab.com


Price:
Free. If you want ongoing advice, management fee of 0.75% to 1.25% of assets, less as assets increase.

Service included:
Recommended mix of funds. Advised on how much more to save.

The experience:
Adviser was assigned. Two 1-hour meetings and a few phone calls.

Pros:
Good “what-if” scenarios (i.e., spend less, retire later). OK fund mix for midlife investors: 60% stocks, 35% bonds, 5% cash. Also offered “moderate,” “aggressive,” and other allocation options.

Cons:
No specific fund recommendations.

Best if:
You’re seeking a snapshot of your finances and potential actions.



Wachovia Bank
Complimentary Retirement Consultation
www.wachovia.com


Price:
Free.

Service included:
Portfolio analysis and recommendations.

Experience:
Adviser was assigned; service complied when client asked to switch to a Certified Financial Planner. Two half-hour phone calls. No written report.

Pros:
Good planning assumptions (pretax rate of return of 7.69%). Reasonable asset mix for midlife investors: 60 to 70% stocks, rest in bonds. Looked at several scenarios.

Cons:
No initial fund recommendations.

Best if:
You want reassurance but no advice. (We didn’t try Wachovia’s Envision service, which it says is more detailed.)



Fidelity Investments
Retirement Income Planner
www.fidelity.com


Price:
Free.

Service included: Interactive online program that forecasts whether you’ll have enough to fund specific goals.

Experience:
Takes far longer to input information than Fidelity suggests. Responsive phone help with technical problems. (We did not test investment expertise.)

Pros:
Conclusions generally backed up by good analytics. Good asset mix for midlife investors: 60% domestic stocks, 10% foreign stocks, 25% bonds, 5% cash.

Cons:
Inflation projection (2%) too rosy.

Best if: You’re a sophisticated investor.


Guide to the table

Three Consumers Union employees and their spouses had two comprehensive financial plans and nine retirement investment plans created over a period of four months. For the comprehensive plans, they anticipated help in all major areas of personal finance, including analyses of net worth and cash flow before and after retirement; investments; insurance; and education, estate, and tax planning. For the retirement plans, they told planners they were seeking to accumulate enough money to retire comfortably and ensure that the money lasts through their lifetimes. Whenever possible, they chose fee-only advisers with at least five years’ experience and at least one professional certification. Advisers were not told they were preparing plans for this report. We masked copies of the plans to eliminate names, logos, and other identifying signs, and sent them to an expert Certified Financial Planner for review.

The Youngs, ages 42 and 36, tried Alliance of Cambridge Advisors, Garrett Planning Network, and T. Rowe Price. The Middles, ages 47 and 48, tried Fidelity, Financial Engines, Charles Schwab, and Wachovia. The Readys, ages 55 and 63, tried the independent financial planner, Vanguard, T. Rowe Price, and Myfinancialadvice.com. Price is what we paid, but it may vary.