
We talked with James N. Weinstein, D.O., M.S., director of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice. He is also chairman of the department of orthopaedics at the Dartmouth Medical School and the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.
Many common back problems–even those that cause severe pain–will resolve themselves over time. Patients without associated symptoms in their legs should generally wait a minimum of 6 to 12 weeks. If there is no improvement, and pain is severe and disabling, spinal surgery is an option to consider provided you have been properly evaluated by a surgeon and clearly understand the risks and benefits of the proposed treatment options.
Get a second and even a third opinion. Good surgeons welcome a second opinion. Patients can also use tools like the Dartmouth Atlas to compare rates of surgeries across regions and see if the "surgical signature" of their area makes them a high-rate region.
Your chance of having a back operation varies largely by where you live. The rate of spinal surgery in the U.S. has skyrocketed over the past two decades and is higher than anywhere else in the world. The related expenditures are staggering. In 2003 Medicare spent more than $1 billion on lumbar fusions alone.
When it comes to spinal surgery, less is more. Most patients in my practice come in for a second or third opinion, and I rarely recommend a fusion. If a fusion is a consideration it requires a lengthy discussion of risks—including longer hospitalization and blood transfusion—and an understanding of the rehabilitation involved. Patients need to know that they do have a choice, and their preferences and values matter.
It is unfortunate that shared decision-making and true "informed choice" is not the norm. Patients want and deserve to have meaningful information presented to them about risks and benefits, particularly in cases in which treatment options are a toss-up.
There are many new technologies available, and they are confusing to patients and their families. Knowing your doctor's experience and his or her results using these technologies is important. Patients should also ask if their doctor is involved in any way with the companies that produce equipment used for surgeries. This is not always an indicator of a conflict of interest, but a good surgeon will willingly disclose any involvement, however slight.
The evidence for multiple-level disk replacement is less than adequate. The evidence for artificial disk replacement for back pain is still evolving. Patients should be cautious about new technologies generally. Because they are available elsewhere doesn't mean they are necessarily better, or that they are safe and effective.
Twelve weeks seems to be the magic number (in order to avoid recurrence), but it really depends on the patient's job. A heavy laborer will require 12 weeks or more, but some sedentary workers return to work after a week or two.