GREEN CHOICE
GREEN CHOICE

GMC Terrain

While this version of the GMC Terrain is not a bad vehicle, the competition had left it in the dust. While nice and roomy inside, the Terrain is less efficient than other five-passenger SUVs, but burns as much gas as larger, seven-passenger models. The 3.6-liter engine, shared with many other General Motors products, supplies quick acceleration times at the test track, but feels sluggish in routine driving.
Alerts
There are 3 recalls on this vehicle. Learn More.
GMC Terrain Road Test

While this version of the GMC Terrain is not a bad vehicle, the competition had left it in the dust. While nice and roomy inside, the Terrain is less efficient than other five-passenger SUVs, but burns as much gas as larger, seven-passenger models.

The 3.6-liter engine, shared with many other General Motors products, supplies quick acceleration times at the test track, but feels sluggish in routine driving. Plus, the unrefined and slow-shifting six-speed automatic transmission does it no favors. With 18 mpg overall, fuel economy from the V6 falls short of more capable and roomy SUVs. Four-cylinder models have an overworked 2.4-liter engine, which returns 21 mpg. Again, that falls far short of rivals, which approach 26 mpg overall. Handling and ride are decent, but ordinary.

At least the roomy rear seat and easy access make this package practical. The interior looks snazzy on the surface, although it's constructed of cheap-feeling materials. What’s more, the top-trim lacks common amenities for the class, such as push-button ignition and dual-zone climate control.

Best Version to Get
The main differences between an Equinox and Terrain are exterior styling and feature content; in general, the Terrain is better-equipped and costs a little more. The Terrain lacks an equivalent to the basic Equinox LS, and the top-level Terrain Denali has some features you can't get on an Equinox....
Change Vehicle