Best Flushable Wipes From Our Tests
In our lab, we tested 11 popular "flushable" wipes from Amazon Basics, Cottonelle, Dude Wipes, Kirkland Signature, and other brands. These are the best picks for personal hygiene—but don’t flush them.
When you shop through retailer links on our site, we may earn affiliate commissions. 100% of the fees we collect are used to support our nonprofit mission. Learn more.
Flushable wipes are controversial. On the surface, they seem ideal: A discreet wipe in the bathroom leaves you clean without repeated wipes with toilet paper. But CR recently interviewed experts who outlined the environmental and economic costs of flushing wipes—all wipes, including those labeled “flushable.”
CR’s sustainability expert, environmental experts, and even the plumber we interviewed support the idea that you should never flush wipes for the sake of our water supply, aquatic life, your household pipes or septic system, and your wallet.
- Flushable Wipes We Tested: Amazon Basics Caboo Charmin Cottonelle Dude Wipes XL Equate Good Wipes Honest Kirkland Signature Nice ’N Clean Up&Up
- More on Wipes: Flushable vs. Nonflushable Wipes vs. Toilet Paper Industry Standards for Wipes How We Tested
Flushing Wipes in Our Lab
CR's José Amézquita flushed one wipe at a time and recorded how many flushes it took for the wipe to pass the toilet’s siphon jet. He performed three separate trials on each wipe brand.
Even though we do not recommend flushing these wipes, our curiosity got the best of us, because, let’s face it, people flush them: Amézquita also ran each wipe through our lab’s toilets and pipes to see which passed through with the most ease. He then repeated that same test with toilet paper and wipes labeled “do not flush.” All wipes were tested right after opening them.
If you’re thinking: Soiled wipes are gross—how can I hygienically dispose of them if flushing isn’t an option? Investing in a bathroom trash bin with a lid that seals tight or even a diaper can with liners and pods that absorb odors can help. Here are our top picks in flushable wipes.
Amazon Basics Flushable Wipes achieved an above-average Overall Score in our tests and were the second strongest wipe (Kirkland Signature, below, was our strongest). But, unlike the Kirkland wipes, Amazon Basics’ cleaned really well, removing sticky honey from my skin with just two passes from one wipe. They also dried easily (without leaving a lingering wet residue behind like some wipes). They come in plastic packaging with a resealable sticker, which Amézquita says can help the wipes retain their moisture better than a wipes package with a clickable lid (which may allow more air in to dry out wipes faster).
These wipes could be pulled out of their packaging fairly well, though four other wipes, including a Cottonelle product, did this better. For the most part, one wipe came out after the next and none ripped when I pulled them out, but they would occasionally bundle up in the package. Even though they were easy enough to unravel, this means anyone using the wipes after you could be touching the same wipes that you touched prior to cleaning their body with them. Along with the Equate and Kirkland Signature wipes, these were the second most cost-conscious in our tests (Up&Up are the least expensive). These are fragrance-free—with one caveat. Amazon Basics and Kirkland Signature share the exact same list of ingredients, but we detected a very light scent on the Amazon Basics wipe. I would describe it as pleasant and it’s nowhere near as overpowering a scent as we experienced from the Up&Up Flushable Wipes, but it may be noticeable if you are sensitive to smells.
As far as its flushability is concerned (remember: don’t flush any of these wipes), Amézquita found this wipe flushed fairly well. All of the wipes passed through the line, but some took more flushing than others. Amazon Basics could be considered average in this category.
Few things are more frustrating when using wipes than trying to pull out one wipe and getting three or four instead, or one wipe that’s torn to bits. Cottonelle Flushable Wipes earned the highest score for dispensing, with one wipe emerging effortlessly after the other and no tears to be found. Their tensile strength was only slightly less than Amazon Basics’ wipes and they come in a plastic package with a clickable lid, which may let in more air than a resealable sticker lid. They removed honey from my skin with two passes with one wipe, but they had a lingering wetness that you may find uncomfortable or want to dry with toilet paper (it eventually dries on its own, but takes longer than some of the other wipes).
These are not fragrance-free wipes. Their scent is called “fresh feel” and I would describe it as a fresh laundry scent, but one that lingered slightly on my skin. In our drain line passage test, this was one of the worst three wipes that didn’t travel effortlessly down the drain line, though the brand claims on the label that it is “Plumber Approved” and “breaks down like toilet paper” in its test vs Cottonelle Ultra Clean, which was our top pick for single-ply TP in our tests.
Caboo Flushable Bamboo Wipes were our sole pick made from renewable bamboo and pulp-based viscose. They are also the largest wipe we tested, fragrance-free, and one of the two most expensive wipes (Nice ’N Clean Flushable Wipes also cost 11 cents per wipe, which is 9 cents more per wipe than our cheapest pick, Up&Up Flushable Wipes). Caboo cleaned well, requiring two passes with one wipe to completely remove honey from my skin, and it dried fairly quickly from the skin.
However, its Overall Score was the lowest of all of the wipes, for a few reasons. It’s tied with Kirkland Signature and The Honest Company as the second most difficult to dispense (one wipe ripped as I was pulling it out of its package). Its tensile strength was above average (but Amazon Basics, Cottonelle, and Kirkland Signature scored higher), and it was one of the three worst when testing how they travel down the drain line. It comes in a plastic package with a resealable sticker lid.
Kirkland Signature Flushable Wipes from Costco are similar to Amazon Basics, with the exact same ingredients list and cost per wipe, but a few key differences will help you decide which wipe is best for you. If strength is your priority, Kirkland scored the highest in tensile strength and was average in how well it travels down the drain line. Kirkland provides more guidance than all other brands about when to flush and when not to flush on its label. It comes in a plastic package with a clickable lid seal, but dispensing wipes was difficult, and I attribute this to not being able to always locate the best place to pull on the wipe (one ripped during my evaluation). These are truly fragrance-free, which differs from Amazon Basics, in which we detected a light scent. But they don’t clean as well as Amazon Basics: it took me four passes from two wipes to remove honey from my skin and I had to re-wipe over the same area.
In 2024, a settlement was reached in a class-action lawsuit involving Costco flushable wipes sold under the Kirkland Signature Moist Flushable Wipes brand. The lawsuit claimed that the wipes were not flushable. Costco denies the allegation and maintains that the product performs as advertised. We reached out to Costco to ask if the Kirkland Signature Flushable Wipes that we purchased from Costco and tested are the same wipe formulation as the wipes that were involved in the class-action lawsuit. We did not hear back by our publication date.
Flushable wipes enthusiasts may look for a brand that can help mask unpleasant smells with a fresh fragrance. Scent is subjective, but in our opinion, Good Wipes Flushable Wipes have the most pleasant light coconut fragrance, and the brand claims on its package that all of their fragrances are hydrosols, which the brand also claims are naturally derived by soaking materials in water. Since hydrosols are water-based they are considered milder in scent and more sustainable than chemical fragrances.
These wipes cleaned honey on my skin with two passes of one wipe, leaving my skin wet for longer than most of the other wipes. They’re average in tensile strength and drainpipe passage, and above average in how well they dispensed from their plastic packaging with a clickable lid. In my experience, I was able to remove several wipes, one after another, and none of them ripped or became clogged in the package.
Other Flushable Wipes We Tested
While some flushable wipes rose to the challenge and performed well in our lab and home evaluation, others failed to capture our attention.
Charmin Flushable Wipes ranked below average in our strength and dispense tests—and was actually our lowest performer when it came to dispensing its wipes. Even though its plastic packaging with a clickable lid is on the smaller side (similar to Cottonelle and Amazon Basics), I found it disastrously difficult to remove one wipe at a time from its package. More than once, two or three wipes would be dispensed at the same time and several ripped in the process. I needed two wipes and three passes with them to remove honey from my skin, but the formula dried quickly.
These wipes have a fragrance that I found pleasant, but make sure you’re not sensitive to scent: though the fragrance wasn’t as overpowering as Up&Up, it wasn’t as subtle as Good Wipes, either. In our drain line passage test, Charmin Flushable Wipes performed above average.
CR demonstrates how much easier it was to remove Cottonelle Flushable Wipes from their packaging compared to Charmin Flushable Wipes.
Dude Wipes were fine. But they didn’t blow us away in testing and evaluations. They scored slightly below average in strength and drain line passage, but were slightly above average in dispensing wipes. When I was removing wipes from their plastic package with a clickable lid, most of the time, one wipe came out after another, but a few times, they didn’t, and one wipe ripped in the process.
They clean well, though. It took two passes for one wipe to fully remove honey from my skin, and they dried very fast, with zero fragrances. These are the second-largest wipes after Caboo Flushable Wipes if size is a consideration.
Equate Flushable Wipes is a Walmart-owned brand that markets itself as comparable to Cottonelle Flushable Wipes and costs 1 cent less per wipe. Its tensile strength was far below average, though, and lower than Cottonelle. Yet, it had an above-average drain line passage and cleared our lab’s toilet better than Cottonelle. It was also fairly easy to dispense these wipes from their plastic packaging, which features a sticker lid.
The wipes didn’t clean as well, though: I needed to use two wipes and pass over honey on my skin four times to clean it (it dries quickly, though).
Like Cottonelle, it has a fragrance that it calls “fresh scent” that is more powerful than Good Wipe or Charmin and smells like a cleaning wipe to me.
Honest Flushable Wipes were exceptionally superior to the other wipes at passing through our lab toilet. I also found them to be efficient at cleaning honey off my skin—they removed it with just one pass from one wipe. The wetness they left on my skin lingered a little while longer than Amazon Basics and Dude Wipes, but this wasn’t a dealbreaker for me.
The bigger issue was that these wipes were our lowest performers in tensile strength tests—by a lot. They were also below average when it came to dispensing them from their plastic package with clickable lid, though in my evaluation I was able to remove them without one ripping. They’re the same cost per wipe as Charmin (which did better in strength tests), but these were easier to dispense and lacked fragrance, which is important for anyone who is sensitive to scent.
Nice ’N Clean Flushable Wipes were the most expensive wipes we tested (along with Caboo Flushable Wipes, which are the same cost per wipe), and the brand claims that it is “plastic-free.” For that price, you are getting a wipe that scored below average in three tests: tensile strength, dispensing, and the ability to pass through our lab toilet efficiently.
To remove honey from my skin, I needed to use two different wipes and pass over the area five times. I still smelled honey on my skin after this and used a third wipe to remove the scent.
Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your feelings about fragrance), this pick has a fresh scent that’s only slightly less powerful than Up&Up’s. Make sure you are comfortable with fragrance if you purchase this brand. When I pulled wipes from its plastic packaging with clickable lid, sometimes two or three wipes would come out at one time.
With the second lowest overall average score after Caboo Flushable Wipes, Up&Up Flushable Cleansing Wipes from Target was a mixed bag as far as how well it did in our tests. Let’s start with the positives: this wipe was above average when we tested its ability to pass through the lab toilet and its tensile strength was also slightly above average. At 2 cents per wipe, this is also the most budget-conscious wipe on our list.
Getting the wipes out of their plastic packaging with a clickable lid was another story, though. As I pulled them out, several ripped. I needed three passes from one wipe to completely remove honey from my skin and its wetness lingered longer than most of the other wipes. If you’re sensitive to fragrance like me, you may not be a fan of this wipe’s (in my estimation) strong “fresh” fragrance. These can be a good choice if you’re on a strict budget, but make sure you’re on board with fragrance and don’t mind a wipe that’s more of a challenge to dispense.
Is There a Difference Between Flushable and Nonflushable Wipes?
Some wipe packages (including all of the flushable wipes that we tested) display a “flushable” label on their packaging while other wipe packages advise against flushing. We also looked at four “nonflushable” wipes (more on this below). At first glance and feel, these types of wipes seem similar, and whether or not they are may vary from brand to brand. According to one 2019 study published in Science of The Total Environment in which flushable and nonflushable wipes were studied, there was “no clear difference between flushable and non-flushable wipes on the basis of their physical properties and their response to moisture.” The study concluded that “physical attributes indicate that both types of wipes are heavier (sheet masses), bigger (surface areas and volumes), thicker (thicknesses), and denser (basis weights and specific volumes)" than toilet paper.
While that last part may be true, Amézquita found that the nonflushable wipes we included in our test were significantly different than the flushable wipes. He added that most of the nonflushable wipes, if not all of them, are meant for bathing or cleaning body parts, which did not include use after the toilet. Nonflushable wipes were, on average, larger than flushable wipes, and far stronger. Their increased strength may be the result of their containing more regenerated-cellulose (RC) fibers, but these synthetic fibers may also be the “key reason for why the wipes cause operational problems in sewer systems.”
Flushable Wipes vs. Nonflushable Wipes vs. Toilet Paper
We didn’t test nonflushable wipes or toilet paper in this evaluation, but we were curious about how they compared to flushable wipes in our lab test. Amézquita put our 11 flushable wipes up against four nonflushable wipes: Honest Sensitive Clean Conscious Wipes, Pipa Mint Body Wipes, Nurture Valley Ultra Thick Bathing Wipes, and Clean Life No Rinse Bathing Wipes. All four of the nonflushable wipes were far stronger than the flushable wipes. They performed much worse in our toilet-flushing tests (remember: nonflushable wipes should not be flushed, either). And, with the exception of Honest Sensitive Clean Conscious Wipes, which dispensed much better than all of the other wipes, including the flushable ones, the other nonflushable wipes scored above average at dispensing, but on a par with Nice ’N Clean, Good Wipes, and Equate. (Cottonelle performed better in this category.)
Amézquita then compared flushable wipes to three toilet paper samples: Amazon Basics Bath Tissue 2-Ply, Angel Soft and Strong 2-Ply, and Cottonelle UItra Clean 1-Ply. A stack of five sheets from each of the toilet papers was used to compare against the flushable wipes. Most toilet paper samples were vastly superior in strength, how well they passed through our lab toilet, and how easy they were to dispense.
Amézquita performed a separate agitation test on Kirkland Flushable Wipes, our strongest wipe, and Dude Wipes, which is one of the most popular flushable wipes on the market. Although many experts have told CR, in no uncertain terms, that flushing wipes results in significant environmental and economic damage, we wanted to see how each dissolves after 16 minutes of agitation at 100 revolutions per minute, after which we poured the wipes through a sieve to see how much was left behind. We also compared the way each of the wipes disintegrated with how well Amazon Basics Bath Tissue and Cottonelle Ultra Clean toilet paper disintegrated. We chose Amazon Basics Bath Tissue because it performed the best in disintegration tests in CR’s review of the best toilet paper, while Cottonelle was our best single-ply toilet paper in the same test. You can see our results in this video:
Agitation Testing of Flushable Wipes in Our Lab
Along with tests for strength, flushability, and ease of dispensing, Amézquita performed agitation tests on Kirkland Signature Flushable Wipes and Dude XL wipes as well as Amazon Basics Bath Tissue and Cottonelle Ultra Clean toilet paper to see how well each disintegrated.
Amazon Basics Bath Tissue 2-ply toilet paper disintegrated 100 percent, and virtually none remained on the strainer. About half of the Kirkland Flushable Wipes sieved through the strainer and disintegrated better than the Dude Flushable Wipes and Cottonelle Ultra Clean toilet paper. Dude Flushable Wipes broke into large pieces, and most of the product remained on the strainer.
Updated INDA Standards for Flushable Wipes
In 2018, the Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry (INDA), which represents wipes fabric makers, wipes manufacturers, and brand owners operating in North America, and Edana, an organization that represents “nonwovens and related industries,” updated their guidelines on the labeling of nonflushable wipes and how they assess whether wipes are flushable. This flushability guideline is called INDA GD4. CR did not follow INDA’s testing guidelines in our tests because we were not assessing the wipes’ ability to pass through pipes and disintegrate over time, because, as previously mentioned, the economic and environmental costs over time are high, and multiple experts recommend not flushing the wipes,
CR reached out to INDA to ask why, despite experts’ recommendations not to flush wipes, it supports the idea that some wipes can be flushed. “INDA and its members recognize that municipal wastewater treatment facilities are having difficulties with consumers flushing certain wipes that were not designed nor labeled to be disposed of in the toilet and we are committed to being a part of the solution to that challenge,” Wes Fisher, director of government affairs at INDA, tells CR. Studies that were initiated by INDA and others found that 0.9 percent of materials found at two wastewater facilities in California were wipes labeled as flushable.
According to Fisher, the industry-wastewater collaboration has led to the enactment of Do Not Flush labeling laws in California, Washington, Oregon, New Jersey, Illinois, Michigan, and Colorado and to the federal WIPPES Act, which has not yet been adopted. For more on legislative efforts, find out whether flushable wipes are really flushable.
CR also asked INDA for a statement on their concerns about microplastics from flushable wipes that experts say are affecting aquatic life and wastewater treatment plants. Fisher responded: "While we are not aware of any flushable wipes on the market that contain plastic fibers, if such a product did enter the market, it would be in violation of the state law in seven states.”
How We Tested Flushable Wipes
Amézquita performed three lab tests on flushable wipes. All of the wipes were tested right after opening them. He utilized a force gauge to find out which were most and least resistant to ripping and bursting. To test dispensing, he observed the ease of opening each package, pulling the first wipe from its package, closing it, and then pulling a second wipe out. A second evaluator also evaluated this in a different setting, by pulling five consecutive wipes out at one time, closing the package, and then pulling another five consecutive wipes. To test how well the wipes could be flushed, Amézquita performed three separate trials on each wipe brand. He flushed one wipe at a time and recorded how many flushes it took for the wipe to pass the toilet’s siphon jet.
To assess how well each wipe cleans, we poured one teaspoon of Manuka honey on our inner arm and allowed it to rest for 10 minutes. We chose honey because of its viscous formulation and its inability to be removed without some effort. We then used each brand of wipes and counted how many passes and wipes it took to effectively remove the honey. Where applicable, we recorded observations about fragrance.