Ad-free. Influence-free. Powered by consumers.
Skip to Main ContentSuggested Searches
Suggested Searches
Product Ratings
Resources
CHAT WITH AskCR
Resources
All Products A-ZThe payment for your account couldn't be processed or you've canceled your account with us.
Re-activateDon’t have an account?
My account
Other Membership Benefits:
Media Room
YONKERS, NY – A new Consumer Reports investigation of infant formulas found that some of the products tested contained potentially harmful levels of arsenic and lead. CR also found per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in almost all the infant formulas tested and one that contained both bisphenol A (BPA) and Acrylamide. Fortunately, most of the baby formula in CR’s tests did not contain concerning amounts of contaminants and chemicals.
“Millions of parents rely on infant formula during the first important months of their babies’ lives and deserve access to safe, healthy and nutritious products,” said James Rogers, PhD, director of product safety testing at Consumer Reports. “Our tests found that some infant formulas had concerning levels of arsenic and lead that could pose health risks for young children. The good news is that most of the samples we tested did not pose these risks, demonstrating that it’s possible to produce baby formula without these dangerous contaminants and that safer alternatives are widely available.”
One day after CR shared its test results with the FDA, the agency announced Operation Stork Speed to “enhance its efforts to ensure the ongoing quality, safety, nutritional adequacy, and resilience of the domestic infant formula supply.”
“It’s very encouraging to see the FDA issue this announcement after Consumer Reports shared our findings about contaminants in infant formula,” said Brian Ronholm, director of food policy at Consumer Reports. “We look forward to seeing the details of how they intend to implement the plan, and we hope the FDA is provided adequate resources and staffing to actually follow through with these promises.”
CR’s investigation is part of its Toxic-Free Kids’ Food campaign, which aims to encourage policymakers and manufacturers to protect children from harmful dyes, heavy metals and chemicals in their food. CR launched a petition today calling on Health and Human Services Department Secretary Robert Kennedy, Jr. to ensure that the FDA has the staffing and resources necessary to keep harmful contaminants out of infant formula.
CR’s food safety team tested 41 different powdered infant formulas, including well-established formulas like Enfamil and Similac, new startups, popular store brands, and imported formula brands, to find out if they contained dangerous heavy metals and other contaminants. Among CR’s key findings:
What Consumers Should Do:
“Parents shouldn’t have to worry that the infant formula they are feeding their newborn might contain toxic chemicals that could endanger their young child’s health,” said Ronholm.. “At a time when many federal agencies like the FDA are facing staffing cuts, it is critical for HHS Secretary Kennedy to make sure the FDA has the resources necessary to ensure that all infant formula is free of dangerous levels of harmful contaminants.”
NOTE: This news release has been updated to reflect that Enfamil Nutramigen had the highest level of lead detected in CR’s tests (4.2 ppb) and that while most of the formulas CR tested had arsenic levels below levels of concern, seven formulas were over CR’s risk level.
Founded in 1936, CR has a mission to create a fair and just marketplace for all. Widely known for our rigorous research and testing of products and services, we also survey millions of consumers each year, report extensively on marketplace issues, and advocate for consumer rights and protections around safety as well as digital rights, financial fairness, and sustainability. CR is independent and nonprofit.
© 2025 Consumer Reports. The material above is intended for legitimate news entities only; it may not be used for advertising or promotional purposes. Consumer Reports® is an expert, independent, nonprofit organization whose mission is to work side by side with consumers to create a fairer, safer, and healthier world. We accept no advertising and pay for all the products we test. We are not beholden to any commercial interest. Our income is derived from the sale of Consumer Reports® magazine, ConsumerReports.org® and our other publications and information products, services, fees, and noncommercial contributions and grants. Our Ratings and reports are intended solely for the use of our readers. Neither the Ratings nor the reports may be used in advertising or for any other commercial purpose without our prior written permission. Consumer Reports will take all steps open to it to prevent unauthorized commercial use of its content and trademarks.