Your membership has expired

The payment for your account couldn't be processed or you've canceled your account with us.

Re-activate

Save products you love, products you own and much more!

Save products icon

Other Membership Benefits:

Savings icon Exclusive Deals for Members Best time to buy icon Best Time to Buy Products Recall tracker icon Recall & Safety Alerts TV screen optimizer icon TV Screen Optimizer and more

    First Drive: 2025 Mazda CX-70 Is a Two-Row CX-90

    There's precious little to differentiate the two quick and agile SUVs beyond seating capacity

    2025 Mazda CX-70 front driving
    2025 Mazda CX-70
    Photo: John Powers/Consumer Reports

    Update: Since this first drive was originally published in May, 2024, we finished testing the Mazda CX-70. Read the complete Mazda CX-70 road test.

    It would be logical to assume that the new 2025 Mazda CX-70 is a smaller, less expensive two-row version of the CX-90 midsized three-row SUV. Yet only one of those things is true: It’s simply a CX-90 without a third-row seat. Just about everything else is identical or nearly identical, including the length, width, wheelbase, available powertrains, cargo room, cabin design, and price.

    Which leads to the question: Why badge the elimination of the third-row seat as a new model? 

    To find out, we rented a CX-70 from Mazda and compared it to the CX-90 and CX-90 PHEV we bought and tested. It turns out there’s very little difference between the two models.

    In this article Arrow link

    Mazda points to the CX-70’s slightly altered front and rear styling and “increased storage,” along with the adoption of Alexa and Mazda Online Navigation, the latter two that the CX-90 doesn’t have. Those don’t seem like big enough changes to call it a new model and could lead to confusion for potential buyers who, understandably, might think that the smaller model number equates to a shorter, less expensive vehicle. Meanwhile, some other two-row competitor vehicles that have also been spawned off of three-row versions show much greater differentiation, such as the Honda Pilot and Passport, Jeep Grand Cherokee L and Grand Cherokee, and Volkswagen Atlas and Atlas Cross Sport pairs.

    More on SUVs

    Model name confusion aside, after spending a few days driving a 2025 CX-70 Turbo S Premium Plus (the top-shelf trim) we rented from Mazda, one thing is clear: It drives just like the CX-90, which in most ways is a really good thing thanks to its 3.3-liter turbocharged inline six-cylinder engine, sharp steering, and responsive handling. The well-crafted cabin also remains, but so do the quirks, including some low-speed powertrain hiccups, an overly firm ride, the totally unintuitive gear selector, and some controls. 

    There are three main configurations of the CX-70. The 280-horsepower CX-70 Turbo starts at $40,445 for the base Preferred trim. The higher-output 340-hp CX-70 Turbo S Premium begins at $52,450, and the CX-70 PHEV (plug-in hybrid electric vehicle) Premium starts at $54,400. CX-70 pricing tops out at $57,450 for the PHEV Premium Plus. All CX-70s are saddled with a $1,455 destination charge, just like the CX-90. 

    Look closely at that pricing and eagle-eyed readers will note that the three-row CX-90 actually has a less expensive base price ($37,845). That’s because the CX-90 is available in the lower Select trim but the CX-70 is not. 

    If you’re a Consumer Reports member, the details of our initial expert assessment of the 2025 CX-70 that we rented from Mazda are available to you below. We have since tested the CX-70. CR members get access to all of our full road-test results.

    Sign up for CR’s Cars email newsletter to be notified when we post our latest road-test results.

    What we rented: 2025 Mazda CX-70 Turbo S Premium Plus
    Powertrain: 340-hp, 3.3-liter turbocharged 6-cylinder engine; 8-speed automatic transmission; all-wheel drive
    MSRP: $55,950
    Destination fee: $1,455
    Total cost: $57,405

    2025 Mazda CX-70 rear static
    Think of the 2025 Mazda CX-70 as a CX-90 without a third-row seat.

    Photo: John Powers/Consumer Reports Photo: John Powers/Consumer Reports

    Become a member to read the full article and get access to digital ratings.

    We investigate, research, and test so you can choose with confidence.