Your membership has expired

The payment for your account couldn't be processed or you've canceled your account with us.

Re-activate

Save products you love, products you own and much more!

Save products icon

Other Membership Benefits:

Savings icon Exclusive Deals for Members Best time to buy icon Best Time to Buy Products Recall tracker icon Recall & Safety Alerts TV screen optimizer icon TV Screen Optimizer and more

    Researcher accused of fabricating results

    Consumer Reports News: March 11, 2009 05:46 PM

    Shocking allegations have surfaced today that an anesthesiologist, Scott Reuben, at the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass. fabricated results in at least 21 studies dating back to 1996. Our sister site, Consumerist.com, reported that Baystate Medical Center has asked for the articles to be retracted by medical journals after an internal investigation stemming from a routine audit uncovered the fraud.

    Reuben's work included positive results for the painkillers, Vioxx and Bextra—both of which have since pulled from the market for safety reasons. According to Scientific American, Reuben "attempted to convince orthopedic surgeons to shift from the first generation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to the newer, proprietary COX2 inhibitors, such as Vioxx, Celebrex, and Pfizer's Bextra (valdecoxib)."

    But now experts wonder whether there is any scientific basis for the treatments he touted. "We are left with a large hole in our understanding of this field," Steven L. Shafer, the editor-in-chief Anesthesia and Analgesia, a journal that retracted 10 of the articles told Anesthesiology News, the publication that broke the story.

    "Interestingly, when you look at Scott's output over the last 15 years, he never had a negative study," an anonymous colleague told Anesthesiology News. We've reported on the problem of publication bias in favor of positive studies before, but this kind of fabrication of positive results is extremely disturbing, not just because of the alleged misconduct by the researcher, but also because the peer review process, the Baystate Medical Center, and the companies that funded him had apparently failed to detect the fraud for so long.

    Kevin McCarthy, associate editor


    E-mail Newsletters

    FREE e-mail Newsletters! Choose from cars, safety, health, and more!
    Already signed-up?
    Manage your newsletters here too.

    Health News

    Cars

    Cars Build & Buy Car Buying Service
    Save thousands off MSRP with upfront dealer pricing information and a transparent car buying experience.

    See your savings

    Mobile

    Mobile Get Ratings on the go and compare
    while you shop

    Learn more